<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are video games art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/18/are-video-games-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/18/are-video-games-art/</link>
	<description>my life. on the internets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston UI Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/18/are-video-games-art/comment-page-1/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston UI Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcuswestbury.net/?p=964#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really difficult to define art. I never really thought of games as pieces of art, but now that i think of it, who&#039;s to say it isn&#039;t art?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really difficult to define art. I never really thought of games as pieces of art, but now that i think of it, who&#8217;s to say it isn&#8217;t art?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bren</title>
		<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/18/are-video-games-art/comment-page-1/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>Bren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcuswestbury.net/?p=964#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>The librarians at the University of Illinois at least recognise them as important cultural artefacts:
&quot;Saving &quot;virtual worlds&quot; from extinction&quot;
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/06/the-art-of-archiving-virtual-worlds.ars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The librarians at the University of Illinois at least recognise them as important cultural artefacts:<br />
&#8220;Saving &#8220;virtual worlds&#8221; from extinction&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/06/the-art-of-archiving-virtual-worlds.ars" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/06/the-art-of-archiving-virtual-worlds.ars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaymis</title>
		<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/18/are-video-games-art/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaymis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcuswestbury.net/?p=964#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Every new generation makes new things that previous generations vilify.

In this post-post-modern world, it&#039;s art if the artist says &quot;it&#039;s art&quot;.

Any argument against any &quot;work of art&quot; as art can be flipped.

&quot;Structurally, computer games are an unimaginative industry.&quot;

Spent much time at drawing classes? Landscape photography? Seen many quantum leaps in painting technique appear in the last 50 years? The infinitely-vast majority of &quot;art&quot; produced throughout the history of the planet is utterly unimaginitive pap.

&quot;Video games are bad for you? That&#039;s what they said about rock-n-roll.&quot; Shigeru Miyamoto

Ebert and his ilk know that throughout history, new forms of art are always frowned upon by the old guard. Anyone entering into the &quot;debate&quot; enters it fully aware of that fact, so the only reasons I can think that they actually start it are:
1. They just want to start an argument and get some attention, or:
2. They think that they&#039;re more special than Rembrandt, Picasso, Dali, Warhol, and all of the other grumpy geniuses that came before.

Also, Penny Arcade said it very well: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/4/21/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every new generation makes new things that previous generations vilify.</p>
<p>In this post-post-modern world, it&#8217;s art if the artist says &#8220;it&#8217;s art&#8221;.</p>
<p>Any argument against any &#8220;work of art&#8221; as art can be flipped.</p>
<p>&#8220;Structurally, computer games are an unimaginative industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Spent much time at drawing classes? Landscape photography? Seen many quantum leaps in painting technique appear in the last 50 years? The infinitely-vast majority of &#8220;art&#8221; produced throughout the history of the planet is utterly unimaginitive pap.</p>
<p>&#8220;Video games are bad for you? That&#8217;s what they said about rock-n-roll.&#8221; Shigeru Miyamoto</p>
<p>Ebert and his ilk know that throughout history, new forms of art are always frowned upon by the old guard. Anyone entering into the &#8220;debate&#8221; enters it fully aware of that fact, so the only reasons I can think that they actually start it are:<br />
1. They just want to start an argument and get some attention, or:<br />
2. They think that they&#8217;re more special than Rembrandt, Picasso, Dali, Warhol, and all of the other grumpy geniuses that came before.</p>
<p>Also, Penny Arcade said it very well: <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/4/21/" rel="nofollow">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/4/21/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

