<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Originality? Now there&#8217;s a novel idea.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/16/originality-now-theres-a-novel-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/16/originality-now-theres-a-novel-idea/</link>
	<description>my life. on the internets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walker</title>
		<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2010/06/16/originality-now-theres-a-novel-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>john walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcuswestbury.net/?p=961#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>There is a sort of  paradox about originality. The theory of the origin  of all &#039;originality&#039;  is called  &#039;Darwin&#039;s theory of the Origin of the Species&#039; :- Error prone copying when combined with selection pressure (survival of the fittest) is the engine of all forms of evolution.   
Hofstadter was right when he said that &#039;variations on a theme&#039; is the basis of all innovation.   
&#039;Appropriation&#039; is quoting- it is  not re-producing;  Cultural evolution is is what happens when the quotation marks are striped off and thus the &#039;quote&#039; becomes once again, a set of instructions ,an action- a movement of mind.  Hence the paradox without copying there is no Meta (change )- there is only Stasis.

Modern art education is pretty poor because it combines an  almost total lack of a meta-understanding of the complex , highly recursive, nature of symbolic systems of representation With ignorance or even open hostility  to wide-ranging  &amp; deep knowledge as the essential basis for  all good teaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a sort of  paradox about originality. The theory of the origin  of all &#8216;originality&#8217;  is called  &#8216;Darwin&#8217;s theory of the Origin of the Species&#8217; :- Error prone copying when combined with selection pressure (survival of the fittest) is the engine of all forms of evolution.<br />
Hofstadter was right when he said that &#8216;variations on a theme&#8217; is the basis of all innovation.<br />
&#8216;Appropriation&#8217; is quoting- it is  not re-producing;  Cultural evolution is is what happens when the quotation marks are striped off and thus the &#8216;quote&#8217; becomes once again, a set of instructions ,an action- a movement of mind.  Hence the paradox without copying there is no Meta (change )- there is only Stasis.</p>
<p>Modern art education is pretty poor because it combines an  almost total lack of a meta-understanding of the complex , highly recursive, nature of symbolic systems of representation With ignorance or even open hostility  to wide-ranging  &amp; deep knowledge as the essential basis for  all good teaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

