<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem with censorship: it&#8217;s not working</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2009/11/09/the-censorship-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2009/11/09/the-censorship-crisis/</link>
	<description>my life. on the internets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2009/11/09/the-censorship-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcuswestbury.net/?p=769#comment-915</guid>
		<description>I think the solution is self-classification, as we&#039;re doing over at Licensd.com

Sure, it&#039;s an illegal, trust-based system at the moment, but it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the solution is self-classification, as we&#8217;re doing over at Licensd.com</p>
<p>Sure, it&#8217;s an illegal, trust-based system at the moment, but it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2009/11/09/the-censorship-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcuswestbury.net/?p=769#comment-893</guid>
		<description>Hi Marcus.

Oddly enough, I started thinking about this from exactly the same premise (that censorship is increasingly impossible) as a response to Donald McDonald&#039;s unspeakably hilarious proposal to classify iPhone apps last month.

I jotted some thoughts there: http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1307952&amp;p=4#r74 

I know it&#039;s a pretty simplistic and hopeful proposal (&quot;the politics would disappear&quot;), but at the end of the day any national debate about censorship which includes a suggestion that censorship is even possible anymore is intellectually bankrupt, so all we&#039;re left with is classification -- And since the CB has made such a terrible hash of that in the 20 years since the Internet has been mainstream I can&#039;t see why they should hold a monopoly over it.


  - mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marcus.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, I started thinking about this from exactly the same premise (that censorship is increasingly impossible) as a response to Donald McDonald&#8217;s unspeakably hilarious proposal to classify iPhone apps last month.</p>
<p>I jotted some thoughts there: <a href="http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1307952&amp;p=4#r74" rel="nofollow">http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1307952&amp;p=4#r74</a> </p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s a pretty simplistic and hopeful proposal (&#8221;the politics would disappear&#8221;), but at the end of the day any national debate about censorship which includes a suggestion that censorship is even possible anymore is intellectually bankrupt, so all we&#8217;re left with is classification &#8212; And since the CB has made such a terrible hash of that in the 20 years since the Internet has been mainstream I can&#8217;t see why they should hold a monopoly over it.</p>
<p>  &#8211; mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
